4.2 Article

Racial Variation in Response to Music in a Sample of African-American and Caucasian Chronic Pain Patients

期刊

PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 14-21

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2008.08.003

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing Alumni Association at Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio
  2. Delta Omega Chapter of Sigma Theta Tau
  3. NRSA (NINR) NIH [1F31 NRO 7565.]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of chronic pain is similar in African-American and Caucasian populations; however, depression and disability secondary to unrelieved chronic pain is higher in African-American populations. In light of this difference, it is important to understand racial variations in response to chronic pain treatments, including complementary therapies such as music. The purpose of this study was to examine racial variation in response to music in an adult population with chronic pain, and specifically to determine if post treatment pain scores differed by race. Secondary analysis from a previously reported randomized controlled trial (n = 60) was used to answer the research questions. Music interventions consisted of listening to music for 1 hour a day for 7 consecutive days. Pain was measured with the McGill Pain Questionnaire short form and a 100-mm visual analog scale. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to examine differences between groups. Music groups regardless of race experienced a decrease in pain and depression at posttest compared with the control group. However, this difference was only statistically significant for the Caucasian music group. Although our findings demonstrate that music may be an effective intervention for individuals with chronic nonmalignant pain; individuals from different racial backgrounds may respond differently. Further studies are needed to understand these differences in response to music. 2009 by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据