4.6 Article

Early visceral pain predicts chronic pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

期刊

PAIN
卷 155, 期 11, 页码 2400-2407

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.019

关键词

Postcholecystectomy pain; Postcholecystectomy syndrome; Chronic postsurgery pain; Visceral pain; Referred pain

资金

  1. Region of Southern Denmark
  2. Udviklingsradet Vejle Hospital
  3. DASAIM's forskningsinitiativ
  4. Fabrikant Mads Clausens Fond
  5. Else Poulsens Mindelegat
  6. Oberstinde Kirsten Jensa la Cours Legat
  7. Laege Frk. K. Rasmussens Mindelegat
  8. Legat stiftet af Foreningen Bikuben

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is related to postoperative pain during the first postoperative week, but it is unknown which components of the early pain response is important. In this prospective study, 100 consecutive patients were examined preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively for pain, psychological factors, and signs of hypersensitivity. Overall pain, incisional pain (somatic pain component), deep abdominal pain (visceral pain component), and shoulder pain (referred pain component) were registered on a 100-mm visual analogue scale during the first postoperative week. Nine patients developed chronic unexplained pain 12 months postoperatively. In a multivariate analysis model, cumulated visceral pain during the first week and number of preoperative biliary pain attacks were identified as independent risk factors for unexplained chronic pain 12 months postoperatively. There were no consistent signs of hypersensitivity in the referred pain area either pre- or postoperatively. There were no significant associations to any other variables examined. The risk of chronic pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is relatively low, but significantly related to the visceral pain response during the first postoperative week. (C) 2014 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据