4.6 Article

Quantification of pain-induced changes in cerebral blood flow by perfusion MRI

期刊

PAIN
卷 136, 期 1-2, 页码 85-96

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.021

关键词

arterial spin labeling; thermal pain; functional magnetic resonance imaging; cerebral blood flow; neural activation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to assess if the functional activation caused by painful stimuli could be detected with arterial spin labeling (ASL), which is a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF), Because ASL directly measures blood flow, it is well suited to pain conditions that are difficult to assess with current functional MRI, such as chronic pain. However, the use of ASL in neuroimaging has been hampered by its low sensitivity. Recent improvements in MRI technology, namely increased magnetic field strengths and phased array receiver coils, should enable ASL to measure the small changes in CBF associated with pain. In this study, healthy volunteers underwent two ASL imaging sessions, during which a painful thermal stimulus was applied to the left hand. The results demonstrated that the ASL technique measured changes in regional CBF in brain regions that have been previously identified with pain perception. These included bilateral CBF changes in the insula, secondary somatosensory, and cingulate cortices, as well as the supplementary motor area (SMA). Also observed were contralateral primary somatosensory and ipsilateral thalamic CBF changes. The average change in CBF for all regions of interest was 3.68 ml/100 g/min, ranging from 2.97 ml/100 g/min in ipsilateral thalamus to 4.91 ml/100 g/min in contralateral insula. The average resting global CBF was 54 +/- 9.7 ml/100 g/min, and there was no change in global CBF due to the noxious thermal stimulus. (c) 2007 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据