4.6 Article

Effects of morphine on the experimental illusion of pain produced by a thermal grill

期刊

PAIN
卷 139, 期 3, 页码 653-659

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.001

关键词

Human pain model; Psychophysic; Allodynia; Thermal sensory system

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. Institut UPSA de la Douleur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compared the effects of systemic morphine on normal (heat and cold) pain and paradoxical burning pain evoked by the simultaneous application of innocuous warm and cold stimuli to the skin. Twelve healthy volunteers participated in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study to compare the effects of intravenous administration of morphine (0.025 or 0.1 mg/kg) or placebo (saline). Stimuli were applied to the palm of the right hand with a thermode (thermal grill) composed of six bars, whose temperatures were controlled by Peltier elements. For each session, we measured the heat and cold pain thresholds and then successively measured the intensity of: (i) paradoxical pain evoked by a combination of non-noxious warm and cold stimuli; (ii) normal pain evoked by suprathreshold heat or cold stimuli; (iii) non-painful sensations evoked by warm or cold stimuli at temperatures used to produce paradoxical pain. Measurements were performed before 20 min after the administration of morphine or placebo and 5 min after the administration of the morphine antagonist, naloxone. The administration of 0.1 mg/kg of morphine, but not 0.025 mg/kg, induced a significant and naloxone-reversible reduction of paradoxical pain intensity, which was directly correlated with the reduction of normal cold pain. No differences were observed for non-painful thermal sensations. The paradoxical burning pain evoked by a thermal grill can be modified pharmacologically by analgesics and share some mechanisms with normal pain. This unique experimental illusion of pain may represent a new model to test analgesics in healthy volunteers. (C) 2008 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据