4.6 Article

Ralfinamide administered orally before hindpaw neurectomy or postoperatively provided long-lasting suppression of spontaneous neuropathic pain-related behavior in the rat

期刊

PAIN
卷 139, 期 2, 页码 293-305

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.020

关键词

Neuropathic pain; Nerve-end neuroma; Autotomy; Spontaneous pain behavior; Preemptive analgesia; Na-I channel blocker; Ca+3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ralfinamide is analgesic when applied as a single dose in rodent models of stimulus-evoked chronic pain. However, it is unknown whether its chronic application after nerve injury can suppress spontaneous chronic pain, the main symptom driving patients to seek treatment. In this study ralfinamide was administered to rats at doses producing plasma levels similar to those causing analgesia in pain patients. The analgesic effect was tested on autotomy, a behavior of self-mutilation of a denervated paw that models spontaneous neuropathic pain. Sprague-Dawley male rats (N = 10-20/group) underwent transection of the sciatic and saphenous nerves unilaterally. Ralfinamide or its vehicle were administered per os for 7 days preoperatively (80 mg/kg; bid), followed by the vehicle or Ralfinamide, until postoperative d42. Autotomy was scored daily until d63. Lasting 'preemptive analgesia' was found in ats treated with ralfinamide preoperatively, expressed by delayed autotomy onset (P = 0.009) and reduced scores on d63 (P = 0.01). Rats treated with ralfinamide (30 or 60 mg/kg; bid) from the operation till d42, but not preoperatively, also showed delayed autotomy (P = 0.05, P = 0.001, respectively). Suppression of neuropathic pain-related behavior was likely caused by a combination of mechanisms reported for ralfinamide, including inhibition of Na+ and Ga++ currents in Nav1.3, Nav1.7. Nav1.8, and Cav2.2 channel in rat DRG neurons, inhibition of substance P release from spinal cord synaptosomes. NMDA receptor antagonism and neuroprotection. (C) 2008 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据