4.1 Article

Large, Single-Center Experience in Transvenous Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction: Procedural Outcomes and Predictors for Mechanical Dilatation

期刊

PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 215-222

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03273.x

关键词

resynchronization therapy; transvenous lead extraction; coronary sinus lead

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate procedural outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction, focusing on predictors and need for mechanical dilatation (MD) in the event that manual traction (MT) is ineffective. Methods: The study assessed results in 145 consecutive patients (age 69 +/- 10 years; 121 men)-a total of 147 CS pacing leads-who underwent transvenous CS lead removal between January 2000 and March 2010. Results: All leads but one (99%) (implantation time 29 +/- 25 months) were successfully removed. MT was effective in 103 (70%), and MD was necessary in the remaining 44 (30%) procedures. In multivariate analyses, unipolar design (odds ratio [OR] 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-7.7; P = 0.005) and noninfective indication (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.8-13, P = 0.002) were independent predictors for MD (P < 0.0001), with a predictive trend for prior cardiac surgery (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.98-5.26; P = 0.06). Five (3.4%) complex procedures required a transfemoral vein approach (TFA) or repeat procedure. No deaths occurred, and there was one major complication (0.7%), cardiac tamponade, after MT. No complication predictors were identified. Conclusions: CS leads were safely and effectively removed in nearly all patients, and 70% were removed with MT alone; 30% required MD. Preoperative predictors suggesting the need for MD or TFA were noninfective indication and unipolar lead design. Complications were rare, and there was no predictable pattern among MT or MD removal techniques. (PACE 2012; 35:215-222)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据