4.2 Article

Relationship of Hearing Loss and Dementia: A Prospective, Population-Based Study

期刊

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 775-781

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000313

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Cognitive impairment; Dementia; Hearing loss; Presbycusis

资金

  1. NIH [R01AG11380, R01AG21136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether baseline hearing loss increases cognitive decline and risk for all-cause dementia in a population of elderly individuals. Study design: Longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Community-based, outpatient. Patients: Men and women aged 65 years or older without dementia at baseline. Intervention(s): All subjects completed the Modified Mini-Mental Status Exam (3MS-R) at baseline and over 3 triennial follow-up visits. Hearing loss (HL) at baseline was based on observation of hearing difficulties during testing or interview. Incident dementia was determined by clinical assessment and expert consensus. Main Outcome Measure(s): Dementia and 3MS-R score. Results: At baseline, 4,463 subjects were without dementia, 836 of whom had HL. Of those with HL, 16.3% developed dementia, compared with 12.1% of those without HL (p < 0.001). Mean time to dementia was 10.3 years in the HL group versus 11.9 years for non-HL (log rank test p < 0.001). In Cox regression analyses controlling for sex, presence of APOE- epsilon 4 allele, education, and baseline age, and cardiovascular risk factors, HL was an independent predictor of developing dementia (hazard ratio = 1.27, p = 0.026 [95% CI, 1.03-1.56]). Linear mixed models controlling for similar covariates showed HL was associated with faster decline on the 3MS-R, at a rate of 0.26 points/year worse than those without HL. Conclusion: Elderly individuals with HL have an increased rate of developing dementia and more rapid decline on 3MS-R scores than their nonhearing impaired counterparts. These findings suggest that hearing impairment may be a marker for cognitive dysfunction in adults age 65 years and older.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据