4.2 Review

Enlarged Translabyrinthine Approach With Transapical Extension in the Management of Giant Vestibular Schwannomas: Personal Experience and Review of Literature

期刊

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 125-131

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ff7562

关键词

Acoustic neuroma; Enlarged translabyrinthine approach; Giant vestibular schwannoma; Surgery; Transapical extension

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana Neuro-Otologica (A.I.N.OT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe and analyze the main outcomes achieved in a series of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) larger than 40 mm in extrameatal diameter, defined as giant VS, submitted to microsurgery by the enlarged translabyrinthine approach with transapical extension. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 2,133 patients who underwent surgery for VS from April 1987 to July 2009. One hundred ten cases of giant VS were elected for analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Extent of removal, residual or recurrent disease, facial nerve integrity during surgery, long-term facial nerve function, and postoperative complications. Results: Total removal was accomplished in 91.8% of cases. In 5 patients (4.5%), total removal was accomplished in 2 stages. Near-total removal was performed in 7 patients (6.3%). The fa-cial nerve was anatomically preserved in 76.4% of cases. Intraoperative facial nerve reconstruction was performed in 8 cases. Facial nerve function after 1 year of follow-up was HouseBrackmann grades I to III in 75% of cases. There were no deaths in this series. Neurovascular life-threatening complications occurred in 2 patients. Cerebrospinal fluid leak was present in 1.8% of cases. Conclusion: Results indicate the enlarged translabyrinthine approach with transapical extension as an elective approach for removal of giant VS. The method permits achievement of a high rate of total removal with low incidence of complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据