4.2 Article

Prevention and Treatment of Meningitis and Acute Otitis Media in Children With Cochlear Implants

期刊

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1331-1333

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f2f074

关键词

Cochlear implants; Meningitis; Otitis media

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To provide recommendations for 1) prevention of acute otitis media and meningitis via immunization and 2) antimicrobial therapy of acute otitis media and meningitis in children with cochlear implants. Data Sources: Literature review and policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Conclusion: 1) Children who are candidates for cochlear implants or have received cochlear implants should receive all-age appropriate vaccinations, including indicated doses of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine, and influenza vaccine. A supplemental dose of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is indicated for children who have received indicated doses of 7-valent pneumococcal vaccine, but have not received 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. In addition, children 24 months and older should receive a single dose of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. 2) Acute otitis media in children with cochlear implants should be treated with an antimicrobial. During the first 2 months after implant, initial treatment of acute otitis media with a parenteral antimicrobial, e. g., cetriaxone, is indicated. High-dose amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate is an appropriate antimicrobial choice for empiric treatment of acute otitis media occurring 2 or more months after implant. In cases of meningitis occurring during the first 2 months after implantation, broad spectrum empiric antimicrobial therapy, e. g., meropenem and vancomycin, should be initiated pending the results of CSF culture. Empiric antimicrobial therapy with ceftriaxone and vancomycin is appropriate for cases of meningitis occurring 2 or more months after implant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据