4.5 Article

Factors Predictive of Voice and Swallowing Outcomes after Anterior Approaches to the Cervical Spine

期刊

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
卷 150, 期 2, 页码 259-265

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0194599813515414

关键词

dysphagia; dysphonia; complications; anterior approach; outcomes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To quantify the incidence of postoperative voice, swallowing, and other problems, including time to resolution following anterior transcervical approaches to the cervical spine, and to assess surgical factors associated with outcomes. Study Design Historical cohort study. Setting Academic medical center. Subjects and Methods One hundred eighty-eight consecutive patients with cervical spine disease who underwent an anterior transcervical approach to the spine by a single head and neck surgeon over a 4-year time period. Rather than primary, single-level approaches, all patients in this study had multilevel, high-cervical (above C4), low-cervical (below C6), and/or revision approaches. Postoperative voice, swallowing, and other complaints were measured as well as time to resolution using Kaplan-Meier method. Surgical factors related to outcomes were analyzed using regression analysis. Results Follow-up was available for 129 patients, with average and median time of 35 months. Seventy-seven patients (60%) had a postoperative issue, including 35 patients (27%) with postoperative voice complaint, 62 patients (48%) with postoperative swallowing complaint, and 16 patients (12%) with other problems. Swallowing and voice complaints persisted beyond 1 year in 28% and 9% of patients, respectively. Approaching spinal levels above C4 and exposing more than 3 spinal levels were 2 factors significantly related to voice and swallowing problems. Conclusion There is a high incidence of subjective voice and swallowing complaints following transcervical anterior approaches to the spine, and such complaints can persist beyond 1 year in many patients. Exposure of more than 3 spinal levels or above level C4 are 2 factors significantly associated with outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据