4.5 Review

Inconclusive Evidence That Age Predicts a Prolonged or Chronic Course of Acute Rhinosinusitis in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base

期刊

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
卷 150, 期 3, 页码 365-370

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0194599813516278

关键词

age; acute rhinosinusitis; prolonged rhinosinusitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; prognosis; evidence-based medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveTo review the evidence whether the risk for a prolonged or chronic course increases with age in adult patients with acute rhinosinusitis. Data SourcesPubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Review MethodsA comprehensive literature search was performed on March 24, 2013, and articles were screened and selected using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Articles reporting studies on age as a predictor for the course in patients with acute rhinosinusitis were included. For included articles, the design of reported studies was assessed for directness of evidence and risk of bias. We aimed to extract hazard ratios for age as a continuous variable. ResultsOut of 13,382 unique publications, 3 articles with moderate risk of bias were included, with a maximum follow-up period of 30 days. The reported hazard ratios for recovery at 10, 15, and 30 days are 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.1) for age as a continuous variable, 0.86 (0.66-1.11) for age dichotomized at 38 years, and 0.58 (0.40-0.84) for age dichotomized for an increase with 20 years, respectively. Conclusion and RecommendationThere is no evidence that age increases the risk for chronic rhinosinusitis in adult patients with acute rhinosinusitis. The literature is inconclusive that age increases the risk for a prolonged course of acute rhinosinusitis and, therefore, does not provide grounds for different management according to age of patients. As such, patients can be managed according to clinical practice guidelines with expectant observation and symptomatic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据