4.5 Article

Expression and Significance of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α and Survivin in Laryngeal Carcinoma Tissue and Cells

期刊

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
卷 148, 期 1, 页码 75-81

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812464759

关键词

hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha; surviving; laryngeal neoplasms

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund, China [09411951000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The aim was to evaluate hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) and survivin expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) tissues and cell lines and to investigate whether HIF-1 alpha has an effect on the regulation of survivin gene expression in LSCC cells under hypoxia. Study Design. Prospective, observational. Setting. Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated First People's Hospital. Subjects and Methods. The expression of HIF-1 alpha and survivin protein in human LSCC tissues was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. HIF-1 alpha and survivin gene expression levels in Hep-2 cells were detected by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blot under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. In hypoxic cells, HIF-1 alpha expression was inhibited by RNA interference. Results. HIF-1 alpha and survivin were both highly expressed in LSCC tissues and significantly related to the clinical stage and lymph node metastasis (P < .05). Meanwhile, a positive correlation existed between HIF-1 alpha and survivin expression (r = 0.456, P < .01). In LSCC cells, HIF-1 alpha and survivin expression were obviously upregulated in response to hypoxia (P < .05). The downregulation of HIF-1 alpha expression dramatically decreased survivin gene expression in hypoxic cells (P < .05). Conclusion. HIF-1 alpha could be considered as an important regulator for the upregulation of survivin gene expression induced by hypoxia in LSCC cells, and both proteins could be regarded as 2 key predictors of malignant progression and metastasis of LSCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据