4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Dysphagia after Nonsurgical Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: Patients' Perspectives

期刊

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
卷 145, 期 5, 页码 767-771

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0194599811414506

关键词

deglutition disorders; head and neck cancer; dysphagia; radiotherapy; chemotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Assess patients' perspectives on the severity, time course, and relative importance of swallowing deficit before and after (chemo) radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Study Design. Before-and-after cohort study. Setting. Head and neck cancer UK multidisciplinary clinic. Subjects and Methods. A total of 167 patients with a primary cancer, mostly laryngopharyngeal, completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI) and the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UWQOL) before treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Pretreatment swallowing, age, gender, and tumor site and stage were assessed. Statistical methods used were Mann-Whitney, analysis of variance, and logistic regression. Results. There was a sharp deterioration in swallowing on average by 18%, from before treatment to 3 months post treatment (mean difference in MDADI score = 14.5; P < .001). Treatment schedule, pretreatment score, and age accounted for 37% of the variance in 3-month posttreatment MDADI scores. There was then little improvement from 3 to 12 months. Patients treated with only 50-Gy radiotherapy reported significantly less dysphagia at 1 year than patients receiving higher doses or combined chemoradiation (P < .001). Swallowing was the most commonly prioritized of the 12 UWQOL domains both before and after therapy. The MDADI and UWQOL scores were strongly correlated: rho > 0.69. Conclusion. Swallowing is a top priority before and after treatment for the vast majority of patients with head and neck cancer. Swallowing deteriorates significantly posttreatment (P < .001). Treatment intensity, younger age, and lower pretreatment scores predict long-term dysphagia. After chemoradiation, there is little improvement from 3 to 12 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据