4.5 Article

Expression of Chitinases in Hypertrophied Adenoids of Children

期刊

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
卷 145, 期 4, 页码 660-665

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0194599811410656

关键词

adenoids; chitinase; rhinosinusitis; otitis media with effusion; allergic rhinitis

资金

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea0920040 [0920040]
  2. Inje University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives/Hypothesis. Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), otitis media with effusion (OME), and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common conditions that have been associated with hypertrophied adenoids in children, and adenoidectomy is clinically recommended. The investigators assayed the expression level and site of acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) and chitotriosidase (ChT) in hypertrophied adenoids of children to determine the expression levels of 2 chitinases in relation to CRS, OME, and AR. Study Design. A prospective cohort study. Setting. A tertiary care facility. Methods. Hypertrophied adenoids from 41 children were harvested during adenoidectomy. Medical records were reviewed and the subjects were grouped according to the presence of CRS, OME, and AR. Messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression of AMCase and ChT in adenoid tissues was assessed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. Immunohistochemical staining revealed the sites of AMCase and ChT expression. Results. mRNA and protein of AMCase and ChT were present in adenoids of all subjects. CRS was a significant variable in AMCase mRNA and protein expression. CRS, OME, and AR were significant variables in ChT mRNA and protein expression. Both AMCase and ChT were expressed in histiocytes and vascular endothelial cells of adenoid tissues. Conclusions. The findings suggest that chitin-containing pathogens or dysregulated immune responses to them in the hypertrophied adenoids of children could be factors contributing to CRS, OME, and AR via AMCase or ChT overexpression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据