4.5 Article

Endoscopic management of skull base defects associated with persistent pneumocephalus following previous open repair: A preliminary report

期刊

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
卷 142, 期 6, 页码 820-826

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.041

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of anterior skull base defects in patients who present with pneumocephalus after previous open neurosurgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients repaired endoscopically for symptomatic pneumocephalus between April 1,2005, and July 1, 2008. Volumetric calculation of the amount of intracranial air based on the preoperative CT scan was performed. RESULTS: Six patients met inclusion criteria. The etiology of skull base defects was accidental trauma in two patients and surgical trauma in the remaining four. Average time from the open intervention until endoscopic repair was 28 days. Intrathecal fluorescein was utilized in five cases, but visualized at the site of the defect in only one patient. All patients were treated with a similar endoscopic technique. A simple free mucosal graft was used in four patients; a mucosal graft was placed over a layered reconstruction consisting of acellular dermal matrix in two patients, with one patient receiving septal cartilage. Closure of defects was achieved in all six patients with complete resolution of pneumocephalus in five patients after an average of 17 days; one patient had trace amounts of pneumocephalus (< 2 cc) at 10 days. Mean follow-up was seven months. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic techniques employed in this preliminary report demonstrate promising results in managing skull base defects associated with clinically significant pneumocephalus following failed prior open neurosurgical repair. The small population size in this study, however, precludes definitive conclusions regarding efficacy. (C) 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据