4.5 Article

Optimizing the surgical field in pediatric functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A new evidence-based approach

期刊

OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
卷 142, 期 1, 页码 48-54

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.10.021

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To conduct the first prospective randomized controlled study 1) evaluating the possibility of improving the quality of the operative field and to provide a bloodless functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in children through total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using remifentanil combined with propofol, and 2) testing the safety and efficacy of remifentanil in propofol-TIVA in inducing controlled hypotension in children at a target mean arterial blood pressure of 50 mm STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: General hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Seventy children underwent FESS under hypotensive general anesthesia with equal randomization into two groups. Group I received TIVA with remifentanil, whereas group II had balanced anesthesia (BA) with esmolol. Heart rate, blood pressure. operative time, blood loss, and quality of the surgical conditions were recorded. RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss in the TIVA group was less than in the BA group. The quality and dryness of the surgical field in both the visual analogue scale and the six-point scale was significantly better in the TIVA group than in the BA group. Hypotension was sustained at the target mean arterial blood pressure of 50 mm Hg in the two groups, without any significant difference. CONCLUSION: Improving the quality of the surgical field and providing a bloodless FESS in children is attainable with TIVA. TIVA using a combination of remifentanil and propofol is superior to BA, even with the use of additional potent hypotensive agents such as esmolol. Both techniques are sale and effective in inducing controlled hypotension in children at a target mean arterial blood pressure of 50 mm Hg. (C) 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据