4.5 Article

Comparative safety evaluation of silica-based particles

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 355-363

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.09.030

关键词

Cell viability; Oxidative stress; Hemolysis; Silica nanoparticles

资金

  1. Swiss Centre of Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT)
  2. Centre of Functional Materials
  3. Academy of Finland [260599, 278812]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Silica nanoparticles (SNPs) are increasingly used as drug delivery systems (DDS) and for biomedical imaging. Therapeutic and diagnostic agents can be incorporated into the silica matrix to improve the stability and dissolution of drug substances in biological systems. However, the safety of SNPs as drug carriers remains controversial. To date, no validated and accepted nano-specific tests exist to predict the potentially harmful impact of these materials on the human body. Methods: We synthesized by a systematic approach 12 different types of SNPs with varying size, surface topology (porous vs non-porous), and surface modifications. We characterized these particles in terms of dry state and hydrodynamic diameter, specific surface area, and net surface charge ( potential). For cellular studies, we exposed non-phagocytic (HepG2) cells, phagocytic (THP-1) cells, and erythrocytes to SNPs. Cellular uptake and stability of fluorescently labeled SNPs were analyzed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. Results: SNPs with a porous surface and negative net surface charge had the strongest impact on cell viability. This is in contrast to non-porous SNPs. None of the studied particles induced oxidative stress in either cell lines. Particles with a negative surface charge induced hemolysis in a concentration-dependent manner. Conclusions: Physico-chemical properties promoting cytotoxicity and hemolysis were investigated. Our study revealed potential hazards of spherical amorphous SNPs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据