4.5 Review

Efficacy, side effects and route of administration are more important than frequency of dosing of anti-osteoporosis treatments in determining patient adherence: a critical review of published articles from 1970 to 2009

期刊

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 741-753

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1335-x

关键词

Adherence; Compliance; Medication; Osteoporosis; Persistence; Preference

资金

  1. Merck Sharpe and Dohme
  2. Sanofi Aventis
  3. Servier
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purposes of the study were to review available published literature on magnitude of non-adherence with osteoporosis regimens and to determine the association between frequency and modality of medication administration with patient preference and adherence. We searched peer-reviewed journal databases-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis and Derwent Drug File for publications (January 1979 to January 2009) including MeSH terms-patient preference, adherence and compliance based on dosing frequency and modality. Since adherence was difficult to accurately quantify, preference, compliance and persistence were evaluated. Patients' preference and adherence at 12 months were higher with weekly over daily bisphosphonates (a parts per thousand yen84% preference for weekly, medication possession ratios (MPR) 60-76% vs 46-64%; persistence 43.6-69.7% vs 31.7-55.7%). MPR reported for oral bisphosphonates were 68-71% at 12 months. At 2 years, only 43% of patients had MPR a parts per thousand yen80% for daily and weekly bisphosphonates. Observational studies (6-12 months) reported discontinuation rates of 18-22% for daily and 7% for weekly bisphosphonates. Data on monthly bisphosphonates are conflicting and confounded by cost differences, patient support programmes and definition of persistence. Studies suggest patient preference for annual zoledronic acid infusions over weekly bisphosphonates (66.4-78.8% vs 9.0-19.7%, respectively), but no data on compliance or persistence are available. Drug effectiveness, side effects and route of administration were more important than frequency. Although less frequent dosing is preferred, other factors such as perceived efficacy, side effects, medication cost, availability of patient support programmes and route of delivery are equally important. Adherence is complex and difficult to quantify and may not be exclusively influenced by frequency of medication administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据