4.6 Article

Weight gain and the risk of knee replacement due to primary osteoarthritis A population based, prospective cohort study of 225,908 individuals

期刊

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 652-658

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.03.002

关键词

Body mass index; Knee replacement; Osteoarthritis

资金

  1. Helse Sor-Ost
  2. Norwegian Orthopedic Association
  3. Dr Trygve Gythfeldt og Frues Forskningsfond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the association between weight gain and the risk of knee replacement (KR) due to primary osteoarthritis (OA), and to evaluate whether the association differs by age. Design: 225,908 individuals from national health screenings with repeated measurements of height and weight were followed prospectively with respect to KR identified by linkage to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate sex-specific relative risks (RR) of KR according to change in Body Mass Index (BMI) and weight, corresponding analyses were done for age categories at first screening. Results: During 12 years of follow up, 1591 participants received a KR due to primary OA. Men in the highest quarter of yearly change in BMI had a RR of 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.9) of having a KR compared to those in the lowest quarter. For women the corresponding RR was 2.4 (95% CI 2.1-2.7). Men under the age of 20 at the first screening had a 26% increased risk for KR per 5 kg weight gain, for women the corresponding increase was 43%. At older age the association became weaker, and in the oldest it was lost. Conclusions: Weight gain increases the risk for later KR both in men and women. The impact of weight gain is strongest in the young, at older age the association is weak or absent. Our study suggests that future OA may be prevented by weight control and that preventive measures should start at an early age. (C) 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据