4.6 Article

Depletion of gangliosides enhances cartilage degradation in mice

期刊

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 313-322

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.015

关键词

Osteoarthritis; Mice; Gangliosides; Glycosphingolipids; Interleukin-1 alpha

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24659661] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) are ubiquitous membrane components that play a functional role in maintaining chondrocyte homeostasis. We investigated the potential role of gangliosides, one of the major components of GSLs, in osteoarthritis (OA) pathogenesis. Design: Both age-associated and instability-induced OA models were generated using GM3 synthase knockout (GM3.5(-/-)) mice. A cartilage degradation model and transiently GM3S-transfected chondrocytes were analyzed to evaluate the function of gangliosides in OA development. The amount of each series of GSLs in chondrocytes after IL-1 alpha stimulation was profiled using mass spectrometry (MS). Results: OA changes in GM3.5(-/-) mice were dramatically enhanced with aging compared to those in wildtype (WT) mice. GM3.5(-/-) mice showed more severe instability-induced pathologic OA in vivo. Ganglioside deficiency also led to the induction of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 and ADAMTS-5 secretion and chondrocyte apoptosis in vitro. In contrast, transientGM3.5(-/-) transfection of chondrocytes suppressed MMP-13 and ADAMTS-5 expression after interleukin (IL)-1 alpha stimulation. GSL profiling revealed the presence of abundant gangliosides in chondrocytes after IL-1 alpha stimulation. Conclusion: Gangliosides play a critical role in OA pathogenesis by regulating the expression of MMP-13 and ADAMTS-5 and chondrocyte apoptosis. Based on the obtained results, we propose that gangliosides are potential target molecules for the development of novel OA treatments. (C) 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据