4.6 Article

Evaluating the responsiveness of the ICOAP following hip or knee replacement

期刊

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
卷 18, 期 8, 页码 1043-1045

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.013

关键词

Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain; Responsiveness; Hip and knee replacement

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [77518]
  2. Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire evaluates the constructs of 'intermittent' and 'constant' pain. Theses are conceptually different from 'pain on activity' and pain 'intensity' as measured by the WOMAC and Chronic Pain Grade (CPG), measures commonly used in OA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the ICOAP, and different pain constructs in primary total hip (THR) and total knee (TKR) replacement. Methods: Patients completed the ICOAP, WOMAC and HOOS/KOOS pain and the CPG pre- and 6 months post surgery. Scores were standardized to 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate worse pain. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all data. The standardized response mean (SRM) was calculated for each measure as were correlations of change scores. Results: The THR group (n = 34) ranged in age from 37-85 years with 74% male. The TKR group (n = 44) ranged in age from 45-86 years with 75% female. Both groups had significant improvement (p < .0001) on all pain measures but the TKR group had smaller improvements. For THR, the SMR was 1.50, 2.31 and 2.29 for constant, intermittent and total scores and for TKR, was 0.84, 1.02 and 1.02 respectively. The SMR ranged from 2.05 to 2.99 for the other measures for THR and from 1.13 to 1.44 for TKR patients. Correlations of the change scores were ranged from 0.26 to 0.81. Conclusion: Multi-faceted constructs of pain are effectively relieved through joint replacement and all measures including the ICOAP demonstrated responsiveness. (C) 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据