4.3 Article

Estimating the abundance of Nepal's largest population of tigers Panthera tigris

期刊

ORYX
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 150-156

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0030605313000471

关键词

Camera trap; capture-recapture; Churia; Nepal; Panthera tigris; tiger

资金

  1. Save the Tiger Fund
  2. US Fish and Wildlife Service
  3. WWF-US
  4. WWF-UK
  5. WWF-International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Information on the abundance of tigers Panthera tigris is essential for effective conservation of the species. The main aim of this study was to determine the status of tigers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal, including the Churia hills, using a camera-trap based mark-recapture abundance estimate. Camera traps (n = 310) were placed in an area of 1,261 km(2) from 20 January to 22 March 2010. The study area was divided into three blocks and each block was trapped for 19-21 days, with a total effort of 3,582 man-days, 170 elephant-days and 4,793 camera-trap nights. The effectively camera-trapped area was 2,596 km(2). Camera stations were located 1.5-2 km apart. Sixty-two tigers (age >= 1.5 years), comprising 15 males, 41 females and six of unidentified sex, were identified from 344 photographs. The heterogeneity model Mh (jackknife) was the best fit for the capture history data. A capture probability ((P) over cap) of 0.05 was obtained, generating a population estimate ((N) over cap) of 125 +/- SE 21.8 tigers. The density of tigers in the area, including Churia and Barandabhar (buffer zone forest linked with mid hill forest), was estimated to be 4.5 +/- SE 0.35 tigers per 100 km(2), using a Bayesian spatially explicit capture-recapture model in SPACECAP. Our study showed the use of Churia by tigers and we therefore conclude that the Chitwan tiger population serves as a source to maintain tiger occupancy of the larger landscape that comprises Chitwan National Park, Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Barandabhar buffer zone, Someswor forest in Nepal and Valmiki Tiger Reserve in India.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据