4.1 Article

Molecular Evolution of Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase Proteins in the Early History of Life

期刊

ORIGINS OF LIFE AND EVOLUTION OF BIOSPHERES
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 621-632

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11084-011-9261-2

关键词

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase; Paralog; Genetic code; LUCA; Horizontal gene transfer

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB 0830024, DEB 0936234]
  2. NASA at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0830024, 0936234] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) consist of several families of functionally conserved proteins essential for translation and protein synthesis. Like nearly all components of the translation machinery, most aaRS families are universally distributed across cellular life, being inherited from the time of the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA). However, unlike the rest of the translation machinery, aaRS have undergone numerous ancient horizontal gene transfers, with several independent events detected between domains, and some possibly involving lineages diverging before the time of LUCA. These transfers reveal the complexity of molecular evolution at this early time, and the chimeric nature of genomes within cells that gave rise to the major domains. Additionally, given the role of these protein families in defining the amino acids used for protein synthesis, sequence reconstruction of their pre-LUCA ancestors can reveal the evolutionary processes at work in the origin of the genetic code. In particular, sequence reconstructions of the paralog ancestors of isoleucyl- and valyl- RS provide strong empirical evidence that at least for this divergence, the genetic code did not co-evolve with the aaRSs; rather, both amino acids were already part of the genetic code before their cognate aaRSs diverged from their common ancestor. The implications of this observation for the early evolution of RNA-directed protein biosynthesis are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据