4.5 Article

Cationic Iridium Complexes Containing Anionic Iridium Counterions Supported by Redox-Active N-Heterocyclic Carbenes

期刊

ORGANOMETALLICS
卷 32, 期 15, 页码 4334-4341

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om4004829

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-09-1-0446]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1266323, CHE-0741973]
  3. Robert A. Welch Foundation [F-0046]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1266323] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first cationic iridium complex supported by two bulky, ferrocenylated N-heterocyclic carbenes, [(1)(2)Ir-(COD)(+)[Cl](-) ([2]Cl+](-); 1 = 1-ferrocenylmethyl-3-mesityl-imidazol-2-ylidene, Fc-NHC; COD = cis,cis-1,5-cyclooctadiene), was synthesized and characterized. Treatment of the aforementioned complex with a mixture of [N(nBu)(4)](+)[Cl](-) and [Ir(COD)(Cl)](2) afforded [(I)(2)Ir(COD)(+)[Ir(COD)-(Cl)(2)](-) ([2](+)[Ir(COD)Cl-2](-)), which featured cationic as well as anionic Ir centers. Electrochemical analysis of [2](+)[Ir(COD)Cl-2](-) revealed that the complex displayed two reversible (iron- and iridium-centered) and two irreversible (iridium-centered) redox processes, which were assigned to the cationic and anionic components, respectively. Stirring [2](+)[Ir(COD)Cl-2](-) under an atmosphere of carbon monoxide generated the corresponding Ir carbonyl complex [(1)(2)Ir(CO)(2)](+)[Ir(CO)(2)(Cl)(2)](-) ([3](+)[Ir(CO)(2)Cl-2](-)). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements of the aforementioned complexes containing [(1)(2)Ir(COD)](+) showed that the iron-centered oxidations were concurrent, reflective of limited electronic coupling between the two ferrocenyl moieties. However, spectroelectrochemical analysis of [(1)(2)Ir(CO)(2)](+)[BAr4F](-) revealed that the electron density at the Ir centers supported by the Fc-NHC ligands decreased upon oxidation of the ferrocenyl groups, as evidenced by a ca. 10 cm(-1) increase in the recorded v(CO) bands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据