4.5 Article

Rapid Access to Substituted Piperazines via Ti(NMe2)4-Mediated C-C Bond-Making Reactions

期刊

ORGANOMETALLICS
卷 31, 期 17, 页码 6005-6013

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om300022u

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAS [2005012]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [20872105, 21002073]
  3. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province [Bu109805]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient Ti(NMe2)(4)-mediated C-C bond-forming methodology toward substituted piperazines, the basic skeleton of several biologically active natural products, has been developed. In reactions of tridentate monoanionic ligands bearing a [-HCNCH2-] linkage with Ti(NMe2)(4), unusual [3 + 3] dimerized complexes through C-C coupling of the putative titanium aza-allyl complex intermediate could be obtained. These complexes contain substituted piperazine backbones and could give rise efficiently to substituted piperazine derivatives via hydrolysis. Treatment of Ti(NMe2)(4) with a series of tridentate dianionic and bidentate monoanionic ligands bearing the [-HCNCH2-] moiety only generated chelated titanium complexes from ligand exchange reactions. Mechanistic studies using DFT/M06 calculations revealed that the methylene in the [-HCNCH2-] moiety of titanium complexes bearing tridentate monoanionic ligands could be deprotonated intramolecularly by dimethylamide anion with an activation energy of about 22 kcal/mol. The resulting titanium aza-allyl complexes from this beta-H abstraction step then undergo a consecutive stepwise [3 + 2] cycloaddition/ring expansion reaction facilely to form the dimerized complex. However, beta-H abstractions for Ti complexes bearing tridentate dianionic and bidentate monoanionic ligands were energetically demanding, as the negative charges could not be stabilized by the adjacent groups in the possible intermediates, explaining the experimental outcomes that no C-C coupled products were formed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据