4.5 Article

Association and Dissociation of Lithium Cyanocuprates in Ethereal Solvents

期刊

ORGANOMETALLICS
卷 30, 期 17, 页码 4771-4778

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om200625z

关键词

-

资金

  1. LMU Munchen (LMUexcellent)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 749]
  3. Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich
  4. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  5. Dr. Otto Rohm Gedachtnisstiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use a combination of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and electrical conductivity measurements to probe the ions present in; ethereal solutions of lithium cyanocuprates. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry shows that solutions of LiCuR(2)center dot LiCN and Li(0.8)CuR(0.8)(CN) (R = Me, Et, (n)Bu, (s)Bu, (t)Bu, and Ph) in diethyl ether contain Li(n-1)Cu(n)R(2n)(-) and Li(n-1)Cu(n)R(n)(CN)(n)(-) anions, respectively. Analogous species are also observed for solutions of LiCu(t)Bu(2)center dot LiCN and Li(0.8)Cu(t)Bu(0.8)(CN) in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, cyclopentyl methyl ether, and methyl tert-butyl ether and were previously found for solutions of lithium cyanocuprates in tetrahydrofuran. Although the change of solvent thus does not lead to the formation of any major new cuprate anions, it has a strong effect on the association/dissociation equilibria. As directly confirmed by the conductivity experiments, contact ion pairs strongly predominate in solutions of lithium cyanocuprates in diethyl ether, whereas the more polar tetrahydrofuran gives rise to larger amounts of solvent-separated ion pairs; a particularly high dissociation tendency is observed for the LiCu(t)Bu(2)center dot LiCN reagent. Temperature-variant conductivity measurements of LiCuPh(2)center dot LiCN solutions in tetrahydrofuran do not show a significant temperature dependence of the association/dissociation equilibria for this system. The present findings largely support the results of previous NMR spectroscopic studies and help to explain how the solvent affects the reactivity of lithium cyanocuprates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据