4.5 Article

Theoretical Study on the Formation of Silacyclopropene from Acylsilane and Acetylene via Silene-to-Silylene Rearrangement

期刊

ORGANOMETALLICS
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 3160-3167

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om2002393

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [18GS0207, 21750063, 2245028]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  3. Kyushu University
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22245028, 21750063] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Density functional theory calculations have been performed for a proposal of possible mechanisms of the thermal reaction of an acylsilane, pivaloyltris-(trimethylsilyl)silane, and bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene yielding a silacyclopropene, 1-[(tert-butyl)bis(trimethylsilyl)ethyl]-1-trimethylsiloxy-2,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)-1-silacycloprop-2-ene. Two reaction pathways in which two different silyl species play a role were considered based on analogous reactions of acylsilane and alkyne: (i) A silene (Si=C) intermediate derived from the acylsilane reacts with the acetylene to yield a silacyclobutene intermediate as a result of a stepwise [2 + 2] cycloaddition, and a ring-opening reaction of the silacyclobutene triggers the formation of the silacydopropene. (ii) The silene intermediate is rearranged to a silylene intermediate, and then [2 + 1] cycloaddition of the acetylene and the silylene gives the silacyclopropene. The high activation energy calculated for the [2 + 2] cycloaddition indicates that the silene would not react with the acetylene, which is consistent with the experimental result that no silacyclobutene intermediate was observed. On the other hand, the second reaction pathway involving the silene-to-silylene rearrangement and the [2 + 1] cycloaddition is more realistic from thermodynamic and kinetic points of view. All the calculated results strongly suggest that the silyl species reacting with bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene is not silene but silylene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据