4.5 Article

Stabilization of Nickel Complexes with Ni0•••H-N Bonding Interactions Using Sterically Demanding Cyclic Diphosphine Ligands

期刊

ORGANOMETALLICS
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 144-156

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/om200709z

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Biosciences and Geosciences
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [FWP 56073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The series of complexes Ni((P2N2R)-N-tBu)(2), [Ni((P2N2R)-N-tBu)(2)]BF4, [HNi((P2N2R)-N-tBu)(2)]BF4, and [Co((P2N2Ph)-N-tBu)(2)]BF4 ((P2N2R)-N-tBu = 1,5-dialkyl-3,7-tert-butyl-1,5-diaza-3,7-diphosphacyclooctane; alkyl = phenyl, benzyl) have been synthesized and characterized. Spectroscopic, electrochemical, and X-ray diffraction studies indicate these complexes are stable as a result of the tetrahedral arrangement of the two diphosphine ligands. Electrochemical oxidation of [HNi((P2N2Ph)-N-tBu)(2)]BF4 results in rapid proton transfer from nickel at a rate faster than can be observed on the CV time scale. Double protonation of Ni((P2N2Bn)-N-tBu)(2) forms the endo-endo, endo-exo, and exo-exo isomers of [Ni((P2NHNBn)-N-tBu-H-Bn)(2)](BF4)(2) , which were found to be more stable toward loss of H-2 than previously observed for similar complexes. The presence of Ni-0 center dot center dot center dot HN hydrogen bonds at the endo protonation sites of [Ni((P2NHNBn)-N-tBu-H-Bn)(2)](BF4)(2) results in significant differences in the Ni(I/O) oxidation potentials of each of the isomers. The differences in E-1/2(I/0) values correspond to bond free energies of 7.4 and 3.7 kcal/mol for the first and second Ni-0 center dot center dot center dot HN hydrogen bonds of the endo-exo and endo-endo isomers, respectively. Computational studies give bond dissociation energies of the Ni-0 center dot center dot center dot HN bonds that are within 1-2 kcal/mol of the experimentally determined values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据