4.6 Article

Acute mental stress and hemostasis: When physiology becomes vascular harm

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 S52-S55

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0049-3848(15)50444-1

关键词

Blood coagulation; Cardiovascular disease; Fibrinolysis; Psychological stress; Risk factor; Thrombosis

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [81BE-56155, 3268277, PP00P1_128565/1]
  2. National Institutes of Health [MO1 RR-00827, HL-57265, AG-13332, HL-36005, HL-44915]
  3. National Institute on Aging [AG-15301, AG-23989]
  4. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  5. University of Bern, Switzerland
  6. University of Zurich, Switzerland
  7. Novartis Foundation Switzerland
  8. Swiss Cocoa and Chocolate Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stress-induced activation of the sympathoadrenal medullary system activates both the coagulation and fibrinolysis system resulting in net hypercoagulability. The evolutionary interpretation of this physiology is that stress-hypercoagulability protects a healthy organism from excess bleeding should injury occur in fight-orflight situations. In turn, acute mental stress, negative emotions and psychological trauma also are triggering factors of atherothrombotic events and possibly of venous thromboembolism. Individuals with pre-existent atherosclerosis and impaired endothelial anticoagulant function are the most vulnerable to experience onset of acute coronary events within two hours of intense emotions. A range of sociodemographic and psychosocial factors (e.g., chronic stress and negative affect) might critically intensify and prolong stress-induced hypercoagulability. In contrast, several pharmacological compounds, dietary flavanoids, and positive affect mitigate the acute prothrombotic stress response. Studies are needed to investigate whether attenuation of stress-hypercoagulability through medications and biobehavioral interventions reduce the risk of thrombotic incidents in at-risk populations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据