4.6 Article

Correlation of Coagulation Markers and 4F-PCC-Mediated Reversal of Rivaroxaban in a Rabbit Model of Acute Bleeding

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 135, 期 3, 页码 554-560

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.01.007

关键词

Anticoagulation reversal; Rivaroxaban; Animal study; Haemorrhage; Prothrombin complex concentrates

资金

  1. CSL Behring GmbH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Rivaroxaban is an oral, selective direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for several indications in patients at risk of thrombotic events. One limitation of its clinical use is the lack of data pertaining to its reversal in situations where urgent response is critical (e.g. acute bleeding events or emergency surgery). Materials and methods: This study assessed the effectiveness of a four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC; Beriplex (R)/Kcentra (R)) for the reversal of rivaroxaban-associated bleeding in an in vivo rabbit model, and evaluated the correlations between in vitro coagulation parameters and haemostasis in vivo. Results: Administration of single intravenous doses of rivaroxaban (150-450 mu g/kg) resulted in increased and prolonged bleeding following standardised kidney incision. Pre-incision treatment with 4F-PCC (25-100 IU/kg) resulted in a dose-dependent reversal of rivaroxaban (150 and 300 mu g/kg)-associated increases in time to haemostasis and blood loss; no reversal was seen at the highest rivaroxaban dose (450 mu g/kg). Of the in vitro biomarkers tested, thrombin generation and whole-blood clotting time correlated well with in vivo measures of 4F-PCC-mediated effects. Thrombin generation was highly reagent-dependent, with the assay initiated using the phospholipid-only reagent being the most predictive of effective haemostasis in vivo. Conclusions: In summary, in a rabbitmodel of acute bleeding, treatment with 4F-PCC reduced bleeding to control levels following rivaroxaban 150 mu g/kg and 300 mu g/kg administration. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据