4.5 Article

Inferences for sources of oils from the Norwegian Barents Sea using statistical analysis of biomarkers

期刊

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 157-166

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.07.011

关键词

Age parameters; Phytanylbenzene; Phytanyl toluene; Diadrimanes; Partial least squares analysis; Principal component analysis; Barents Sea; Oil-source correlation; Biomarkers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional biomarker age indicators may not always give conclusive inferences for the age of an oil's source rock, particularly with regard to condensates, in which most of the key biomarkers are often too sparse to determine. It is possible that other compounds, reflecting changes in primary producer assemblages or depositional environment, can provide age indications in basins that have experienced a progressive change in conditions. The Norwegian Barents Sea provides an opportunity to evaluate this approach, although the gradual changes are punctuated by intervals of stratification, OAEs and extinctions. Partial least squares analysis was used to identify a number of apparently suitable parameters, to establish an age calibration from source rock extracts and then to apply it to a variety of oils and condensates from the Barents Sea. The resulting source age inferences are consistent with conventional age parameters for the normal oils, providing a degree of confidence in their applicability to the problematic condensates. In the main part of the Hammerfest Basin, oils of Jurassic origin dominate, whereas contributions from Triassic sources are suggested towards the margins, particularly in pre-Jurassic reservoirs. To the east, on the Norsel High and in the Nordkapp Basin, the main oil sources are suggested to be Early Triassic, although a Palaeozoic, possibly Permian, source is likely on the margin of the Finnmark Platform in well 7128/4-1. Among the novel parameters, the relative abundances of phytanyl arenes and diadrimanes appear to be controlled by diagenetic conditions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据