4.6 Article

Effect of PEDOT-PSS resistivity and work function on PLED performance

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 245-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.11.029

关键词

PLED; PEDOT; Solution processable; Work function; Resistivity; SETFOS 3.2

资金

  1. Durham Energy Institute
  2. EPSRC [EP/I013695/1, EP/H045155/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H045155/1, EP/I013695/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of a commonly used hole injection layer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT-PSS), on polymer light-emitting diode (PLED) performance has been investigated. A series of four different types of commercial PEDOT-PSS, with varying resistivity and work function were examined in devices with the structure Indium Tin Oxide (ITO)/PEDOT-PSS/High Molecular Weight Poly(n-vinylcarbazole) (PVKH): 30% N, N'-bis(3-methylphenyl)-N, N'-diphenylbenzidine (TPD)/Low molecular Weight Poly (n-vinylcarbazole) (PVKL): 40% 2-(4-Biphenyl)-5-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole (PBD): 8% Ir(ppy)(3). It was found that the PEDOT-PSS with the highest work function and resistivity produced the devices with the highest efficiencies; this is due to the improved hole injection effect, the decrease in electron leakage current and the prevention of pixel crosstalk. A maximum device current efficiency of 33.4 cd A 1 has been achieved for the most resistive PEDOT; this corresponded to an external quantum efficiency (E.Q.E.) of 11%. Increasing the work function of the PEDOT used resulted in a 60% increase in E.Q.E. and device efficiency for PEDOTs in the same resistivity range. Drift-diffusion simulations, carried out using SEmiconducting Thin Film Optics Simulation software (SETFOS) 3.2, produced J-V curves in good agreement with the experimentally observed results; this allowed us to extract qualitative values for the effective device mobility along with the PEDOT work function and resistivity. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据