4.6 Article

Carbon monoxide inhibits sprouting angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 phosphorylation

期刊

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 329-337

出版社

SCHATTAUER GMBH-VERLAG MEDIZIN NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN
DOI: 10.1160/TH14-01-0002

关键词

Carbon monoxide; vascular endothelial growth factor; angiogenesis; endothelial cells; vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [RG/09/001/25940]
  2. Medical Research Council [G0700288]
  3. Czech Ministry of Education [LH11030]
  4. MRC [MR/K024868/1, G0600270, G0700288] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. British Heart Foundation [RG/09/001/25940] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700288, MR/K024868/1, G0600270] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a gaseous autacoid known to positively regulate vascular tone; however, its role in angiogenesis is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CO on angiogenesis and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-2 phosphorylation. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured on growth factor-reduced Matrigel and treated with a CO-releasing molecule (CORM-2) or exposed to CO gas (250 ppm). Here, we report the surprising finding that exposure to CO inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced endothelial cell actin reorganisation, cell proliferation, migration and capillary-like tube formation. Similarly, CO suppressed VEGF-mediated phosphorylation of VEGFR-2 at tyrosine residue 1175 and 1214 and basic fibroblast growth factor- (FGF-2) and VEGF-mediated Akt phosphorylation. Consistent with these data, mice exposed to 250 ppm CO (1h/day for 14 days) exhibited a marked decrease in FGF-2-induced Matrigel plug angiogenesis (p<0.05). These data establish a new biological function for CO in angiogenesis and point to a potential therapeutic use for CO as an anti-angiogenic agent in tumour suppression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据