4.6 Editorial Material

US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis: executive summary

期刊

THORAX
卷 71, 期 1, 页码 88-90

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207983

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  2. European Cystic Fibrosis Society
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Cambridge NIHR BRC
  5. Intramural programme of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH
  6. Vaincre La Mucoviscidose [VLMIC1014, RF20120600689]
  7. Region Ile-de-France Domaine d'Interet Majeur Maladies Infectieuses et Emergentes
  8. CF Foundation Clinical Research Award [NICK13A0]
  9. Imperial College London NIHR Respiratory BRU
  10. Cystic Fibrosis Trust [VIA025] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZIAHL006200] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous environmental organisms that can cause chronic pulmonary infection, particularly in individuals with preexisting inflammatory lung disease, such as cystic fibrosis (CF). Pulmonary disease (PD) caused by NTM has emerged as a major threat to the health of individuals with CF, but remains difficult to diagnose and problematic to treat. In response to this challenge, the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) convened a panel of 19 experts to develop consensus recommendations for the screening, investigation, diagnosis and management of NTM-PD in individuals with CF. PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) methodology and systematic literature reviews were employed to inform draft recommendations, which were then modified to achieve consensus and subsequently circulated for public consultation within the USA and European CF communities. We have thus generated a series of pragmatic, evidence-based recommendations as an initial step in optimising management for this challenging condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据