Planar and textured heterojunction organic photovoltaics based on chloroindium phthalocyanine (ClInPc) versus titanyl phthalocyanine (TiOPc) donor layers

Planar and textured heterojunction solar cells (OPVs) are reported for vacuum deposited chloroindium phthalocyanine (ClInPc)/C-60 heterojunctions, and their response compared to previously explored OPVs based on titanyl phthalocyanine (TiOPc)/C-60 heterojunctions. As for TiOPc/C-60 OPVs, the photoelectrical activity of ClInPc/C-60 OPVs extends well into the near infrared, with good activity out to ca. 900 nm. As-deposited ClInPc films (Phase I) produce open-circuit photopotentials, V-OC as high as ca. 0.8 V (Phase I form of ClInPc), ca. 0.15 V larger than previously observed for Phase I TiOPc/C-60 OPVs. The offsets in frontier orbital energies (EPHOMOPc-E-LUMO(C60)) revealed by UV-photoemission studies (UPS) are slightly smaller for ClInPc/C-60 versus TiOPc/C-60 heterojunctions, and the interface dipole contribution (shift in local vacuum level) to these offsets is in the opposite direction for ClInPc/C-60 versus TiOPc/C-60 heterojunctions, or missing altogether, suggesting differences in molecular interaction at the Pc/C-60 interface. Higher V-OC values are correlated with lower reverse saturation currents, J(o), for ClInPc/C-60, versus other Pc or pentacene/C-60 heterojunctions, suggesting weak intermolecular interactions at the ClInPc/C-60 interface and large barriers to dark charge injection. Solvent annealing of the ClInPc films enhances the near-IR response, and textures the Pc film, enhancing the Pc/C-60 interfacial contact area and the short-circuit photocurrent, J(SC). J(SC) under AM 1.5 illumination conditions was estimated by integration of the incident photon current efficiency (IPCE) response, to compare relative power conversion efficiencies for the two different device types. The estimated efficiency of Phase I ClInPc/C-60 OPVs is ca. 2.6%. The estimated AM 1.5 efficiency of ClInPc/C-60 OPVs with solvent annealed Pc layers is estimated to be ca. 3.3%, arising from the extensive texturing achieved of the Pc layer, which nearly doubles J(SC) for the Phase II versus Phase I Pc films. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.