4.6 Article

Mixing of molecular exciton and excimer phosphorescence to tune color and efficiency of organic LEDs

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 388-396

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.11.017

关键词

Organic light-emitting diodes; Organic electroluminescence; Exciton phosphorescence; Excimer phosphorescence; White light-emitting diodes; Platinum; Luminescence

资金

  1. CNR [PM.P04.010]
  2. FIRB
  3. University of Durham
  4. E.U. [COST-D35]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report highly efficient, variable-color light-emitting diodes (LEDs) realized via mixing of molecular exciton and excimer phosphorescent emissions from a new organic phosphor platinum N boolean AND C-2 boolean AND N-[1,3-di(4-methoxy-pyrid-2-yl)-4,6-difluorobenzene] chloride ((PtLCl)-Cl-26), a member of the Pt(N boolean AND C boolean AND N) complex series, where N boolean AND C boolean AND N represents a cyclometallating tridentate ligand based on 1,3-dipyridylbenzene, L. (PtLCl)-Cl-26-doped TCTA blends [TCTA = 4,4',4 ''-tris(N-carbazolyl-triphenylamine)] have been used as either the low-concentration bluish-green (molecular) phosphorescence emitter or high-concentration red (excimer) phosphorescence emitter. By adjusting the relative amount of blue and red emissive species, the color of the light emission was tuned from bluish-green through green and white up to red. The concentration-optimized devices can easily reach high brightness up to B = 10,000 cd/m(2), achieving extremely high external quantum efficiency (EQE) up to 20% at low-current densities (<10(-2) mA/cm(2)) and up to 17% at B = 500 cd/m(2). High purity white light emission [CIE coordinates (x = 0.34, y = 0.35)] was realized at this B, QE = 11.5%, power efficiency of 6.8 lm/W and color rendering index (CRI) = 74, though CRI = 81 has been achieved with CIE coordinates (x = 0.42, y = 0.38). The reported performance data are among the best achievements reported for color and white emission organic LEDs. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据