4.6 Article

Community-acquired pneumonia as medical emergency: predictors of early deterioration

期刊

THORAX
卷 70, 期 6, 页码 551-558

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206744

关键词

Pneumonia

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung. BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research in Germany) [01KI07145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Early organ dysfunction determines the prognosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and recognition of CAP as a medical emergency has been advocated. Objective To characterise patients with emergency CAP' and evaluate predictors for very early organ failure or death. Methods 3427 prospectively enrolled patients of the CAPNETZ cohort were included. Emergency CAP was defined as requirement for mechanical ventilation or vasopressor support (MV/VS) or death within 72h and 7days after hospital admission, respectively. To determine independent predictors, multivariate Cox regression was employed. The ATS/IDSA 2007 minor criteria were evaluated for prediction of emergency CAP in patients without immediate need of MV/VS. Results 140 (4%) and 173 (5%) patients presented with emergency CAP within 3 and 7days, respectively. Hospital mortality of patients presenting without immediate need of MV/VS was highest. Independent predictors of emergency CAP were the presence of focal chest signs, home oxygen therapy, multilobar infiltrates, altered mental status and altered vital signs (hypotension, raised respiratory or heart rate, hypothermia). The ATS/IDSA 2007 minor criteria showed a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, whereas the positive predictive value was low. Reduction to 6 minor criteria did not alter accuracy. Conclusions Emergency CAP is a rare but prognostic relevant condition, mortality is highest in patients presenting without immediate need of MV/VS. Vital sign abnormalities and parameters indicating acute organ dysfunction are independent predictors, and the ATS/IDSA 2007 minor criteria show a high negative predictive value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据