4.6 Article

Radical carbonylation of omega-alkynylamines leading to alpha-methylene lactams. Synthetic scope and the mechanistic insights

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 3780-3786

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1ob05145h

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT [2105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tin hydride mediated radical carbonylation and cyclization reaction was investigated using a variety of omega-alkynyl amines as substrates. In this reaction alpha-methylene and alpha-stannylmethylene lactams having five to eight membered rings were obtained as principal products. In cases where the nitrogen has a substituent capable of giving stable radicals, such as an alpha-phenethyl group, the lactam ring formation again took place with extrusion of an alpha-phenethyl radical. Coupled with the subsequent protodestannylation procedure (TMSCl plus MeOH), these reactions provide a useful entry to a-methylene lactams with incorporation of CO as a lactam carbonyl group. In cases where the amines do not have a substituent acting as a radical leaving group, a reaction course involving a 1,4-H shift is chosen so as to liberate tin radicals ultimately. Thus the proposed mechanism involves (i) nucleophilic attack of amine nitrogen onto a carbonyl group of alpha,beta-unsaturated acyl radicals/alpha-ketenyl radicals via lone pair-pi* interaction, which leads to zwitterionic radical species, (ii) the subsequent proton shift from N to O to give hydroxyallyl radicals, (iii) 1,4-hydrogen shift from O to C, and (iv) beta-scission to give lactams with liberation of tin radicals. DFT calculations reveal that the 1,4-hydrogen shifts, the key step of the reaction mechanism, can proceed under usual reaction conditions. On the other hand, an S(H)(i) type reaction to give lactams may be the result of the beta-scission of the similar zwitterionic radical intermediates. DFT calculations also predict that an S(H)(i) type reaction would result when the intermediate has a good (radical) leaving group such as a phenethyl group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据