4.6 Article

Rhodamine-based probes for metal ion-induced chromo-/fluorogenic dual signaling and their selectivity towards Hg(II) ion

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 4467-4480

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ob01179g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi [SR/FTP/CS-138/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new signaling probes 2-6, rhodamine-B derivatives of various receptors which contain different donor atoms for effective metal ion coordination, were synthesized and their absorption as well as fluorescence spectral responses were evaluated in the presence of various metal ions. All these probes along with the reference probe 1 have exhibited optimal metal ion-induced absorption and fluorescence enhancement with Hg(II) ion in the longer wavelength region (>500 nm) in MeCN, exploiting the spectral characteristics of metal ion-induced structural transformation of rhodamine. The selectivity and sensitivity towards Hg(II) ion were better pronounced in MeCN-H2O (1 : 1 v/v) medium, implying the role of the solvent molecules, water in particular, in the preferential Hg(II) coordination environment. Complexation of Hg(II) to 1-6 not only enhanced the absorption at similar to 560 nm, which turned the colourless solution into pink to facilitate a naked eye detection, but also amplified the fluorescence intensity simultaneously to offer high sensitivity of detection at lower concentration. The Hg(II)-induced photo-physical spectral responses of 1-6 in presence of other competitive metal ions rendered their high selectivity towards Hg(II). Further, their reversible dual channel signaling pattern under the action of counter anions, exploiting coordination tendency of anions towards Hg(II), which compete with probe-metal interaction, implied the reversibility in their Hg(II) coordination. The selectivity, sensitivity and reversibility, in principle, establishes the potential of these probes as chemosensors for Hg(II) ion detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据