4.6 Article

Computational design of a thermostable mutant of cocaine esterase via molecular dynamics simulations

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 4138-4143

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ob00972e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 DA025100, R01 DA021416, R01 DA013930]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA013930, R01DA025100] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cocaine esterase (CocE) has been known as the most efficient native enzyme for metabolizing naturally occurring cocaine. A major obstacle to the clinical application of CocE is the thermoinstability of native CocE with a half-life of only similar to 11 min at physiological temperature (37 degrees C). It is highly desirable to develop a thermostable mutant of CocE for therapeutic treatment of cocaine overdose and addiction. To establish a structure-thermostability relationship, we carried out molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at 400 K on wild-type CocE and previously known thermostable mutants, demonstrating that the thermostability of the active form of the enzyme correlates with the fluctuation (characterized as the root-mean square deviation and root-mean square fluctuation of atomic positions) of the catalytic residues (Y44, S117, Y118, H287, and D259) in the simulated enzyme. In light of the structure-thermostability correlation, further computational modelling including MD simulations at 400 K predicted that the active site structure of the L169K mutant should be more thermostable. The prediction has been confirmed by wet experimental tests showing that the active form of the L169K mutant had a half-life of 570 min at 37 degrees C, which is significantly longer than those of the wild-type and previously known thermostable mutants. The encouraging outcome suggests that the high-temperature MD simulations and the structure-thermostability relationship may be considered as a valuable tool for the computational design of thermostable mutants of an enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据