4.6 Article

Symmetric dithiodigalactoside: strategic combination of binding studies and detection of selectivity between a plant toxin and human lectins

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 9, 期 15, 页码 5445-5455

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ob01235a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry [CTQ2009-08536, SAF2008-00945, BFU2006-10288, BFU2009-10052]
  2. EC [MRTN-CT-2005-019561, ID 260600]
  3. Verein zur Forderung des biologisch-technologischen Fortschritts in der Medizin e. V.
  4. CIBER of Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES)
  5. Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thioglycosides offer the advantage over O-glycosides to be resistant to hydrolysis. Based on initial evidence of this recognition ability for glycosyldisulfides by screening dynamic combinatorial libraries, we have now systematically studied dithiodigalactoside on a plant toxin (Viscum album agglutinin) and five human lectins (adhesion/growth-regulatory galectins with medical relevance e.g. in tumor progression and spread). Inhibition assays with surface-presented neoglycoprotein and in solution monitored by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy, flanked by epitope mapping, as well as isothermal titration calorimetry revealed binding properties to VAA (K-a: 1560 +/- 20 M (1)). They were reflected by the structural model and the affinity on the level of toxin-exposed cells. In comparison, galectins were considerably less reactive, with intrafamily grading down to very minor reactivity for tandem-repeat-type galectins, as quantitated by radioassays for both domains of galectin-4. Model building indicated contact formation to be restricted to only one galactose moiety, in contrast to thiodigalactoside. The tested glycosyldisulfide exhibits selectivity between the plant toxin and the tested human lectins, and also between these proteins. Therefore, glycosyldisulfides have potential as chemical platform for inhibitor design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据