4.6 Article

Therapy options and long-term results of sinonasal malignancies

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 1031-1037

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.04.005

关键词

Malignancy; Nose; Paranasal sinuses; Sinonasal cancer; Sinonasal tract; Recurrence; Surgery; Endoscopy; Radiation therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Nasal and paranasal sinus malignancies are rare. The most common lesions are located in the nasal cavity and the maxillary sinus, although they also occur in the ethmoid, sphenoid and frontal sinuses. Treatment often combines surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Endoscopic surgical approaches are increasingly used in order to reduce the morbidity associated with standard open resection. The aim of our study was to analyse the long-term treatment results of sinonasal malignancies (SNM), with a special focus on surgical approaches. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 123 patients treated in a tertiary referral centre from 1992 to 2008 was conducted, which included information on tumour stage, histology, treatment and follow-up. Results: A variety of histological types were found with squamous cell carcinoma being the most frequent (n = 38), followed by melanoma (n = 24) and adenocarcinoma (n = 21). Open surgery was performed in 55 patients, and endoscopic resection was performed in 28 patients. Nineteen patients were treated with primary radiation therapy (RTX), four underwent primary chemotherapy (CTX), and 15 had primary chemoradiation (RCTX). Two patients died prior to therapy onset. A comparison of survival rates did not show a significant difference between the treatment groups. Patients that underwent endoscopic resection had significantly fewer postoperative complications. Conclusion: In carefully selected patients, endoscopic surgery of SNM showed a similar outcome as open surgery, but with a significantly lower complication rate. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据