4.6 Article

The prognostic value of hypoxia markers in T2-staged oral tongue cancer

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 63-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.03.017

关键词

Tongue cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Hypoxia; Biomarkers; Survival; Prognostic predictor

资金

  1. Korea Government (MOEHRD, Basic Research Promotion Fund) [KRF-2007-331-E00146]
  2. Ministry of Health Welfare
  3. National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Seoul, South Korea [0620160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor hypoxia is associated with poorer outcome in patients with head and neck carcinomas, but little is known about hypoxia biomarkers in oral tongue cancer. We evaluated whether hypoxia biomarkers and clinicopathologic variables were prognostic predictors in patients with T2-staged squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral tongue. Tissue microarrays were constructed from formatin-fixed tumor blocks of 43 patients with T2-staged tongue SCCs treated by surgical resection and neck dissection. Tissue samples were stained with monoclonal antibodies to hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha, HIF-2 alpha, carbonic anhydrase (CA)-9, glucose transporter (GLUT)-1, and erythropoietin receptor (EPOR). Locoregional. control and survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were calculated from uni- and multivariate analyses. Tumor thickness was correlated with expression of CA-9 and GLUT-1 and nodal classification was correlated with GLUT-1 expression. The nodal metastasis rate was 51%, and the 5-year locoregional control and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 59% and 69%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that HIF-1 alpha and EPOR expression were significantly related to DSS. Multivariate analysis showed that EPOR expression was an independent predictor of DSS (P = 0.030). EPOR expression may be an independent predictor for DSS in patients with T2-staged SCC of the oral tongue. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据