4.6 Article

Photodynamic therapy outcome for oral verrucous hyperplasia depends on the clinical appearance, size, color, epithelial dysplasia, and surface keratin thickness of the lesion

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 595-600

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.08.016

关键词

5-aminolevulinic acid; oral verrucous hyperplasia; topical photodynamic therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our previous studies showed that oral verrucous hyperplasia (OVH) lesions can be successfully treated with a topical. 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy (topical ALA-PDT) protocol using a 635-nm light-emitting diode Light source. In this study, we report the clinical. outcomes of 36 OVH lesions treated by this protocol and assess what clinicopathological parameters of OVH lesions could influence PDT treatment outcomes. We found that all the 36 OVH lesions showed complete response (CR) after an average of 3.8 (range, 1-6) treatments of topical ALA-PDT. OVH lesions with an clinical. appearance of a mass, with the greatest diameter <1.5 cm, with the pink color, with epithelial, dysplasia, or with the surface keratin Layer <= 40 mu m needed significantly less mean treatment numbers of PDT to achieve a CR than OVH lesions with an outer appearance of a plaque or a combination type of peripheral plaque and central mass (p = 0.000), with the greatest diameter >= 1.5 cm (p = 0.011), with the white color (p = 0.000), without epithelial. dysplasia (p = 0.043), or with the surface keratin layer >40 mu m (p = 0.003), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only the clinical appearance of OVH Lesions was the independent factor (p = 0.0069). We conclude that complete regression of OVH lesions can be achieved by less than seven treatments of topical ALA-PDT once a week. The PDT treatment outcome for OVH depends on the outer appearance, size, color, epithelial dysplasia, and surface keratin thickness of the lesion. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据