4.6 Article

Anti-inflammatory action of cholecystokinin and melatonin in the rat parotid gland

期刊

ORAL DISEASES
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 661-667

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01672.x

关键词

lipopolysaccharide-induced salivary gland inflammation; myeloperoxidase activity; anti-inflammatory; cholecystokinin; melatonin; nitric oxide-synthase inhibitors

资金

  1. Swedish Science Council [05927]
  2. LUA/ALF [ALFGBG-11907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To define the influence of cholecystokinin and melatonin on the inflammatory response of the lipopolysaccharide-exposed rat parotid gland. Materials and methods: Bacterial lipopolysaccharide was infused retrogradely into the parotid duct. The degree of inflammation three hours postadministration was estimated from the activity of myeloperoxidase, reflecting glandular neutrophil infiltration. Results: The myeloperoxidase activity of the lipopolysaccharide-exposed gland was 10-fold greater than that of the contralateral gland. Combined with sulphated cholecystokinin-8 (10 or 25 mu g kg-1, given twice intraperitoneally) or melatonin (10 or 25 mg kg-1 x 2) the lipopolysaccharide-induced response was elevated 4.6- and 3.5-folds at the most. The cholecystokinin-A receptor antagonist lorglumide reduced the inhibitory effect of cholecystokinin-8, while the melatonin 2-preferring receptor antagonist luzindole had no effect on the melatonin-induced inhibition. Unselective nitric oxide-synthase inhibition abolished the increase in myeloperoxidase activity, whereas inhibition of inducible or neuronal nitric oxide-synthase (of non-nervous origin) halved the inflammatory response. Conclusion: Some hormones may contribute to anti-inflammatory action in salivary glands in physiological conditions. They are potential pharmacological tools for treating gland inflammation. The inflammation, as judged from the myeloperoxidase activity, was entirely dependent on nitric oxide-synthase activity, indicating that the hormones directly or indirectly reduced the generation of nitric oxide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据