4.4 Article

Preferential sputtering in phosphate glass systems for the processing of bioactive coatings

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 589, 期 -, 页码 534-542

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.05.072

关键词

Phosphate glass; Bioresorbable; Preferential sputtering; Bioactive thin-films; Osseointegration

资金

  1. MeDe Innovation, the EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Medical Devices [EP/K029592/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K029592/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/K029592/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphate based glass (PBG) coatings of up to 2.6 mu m thick have been applied by RF magnetron sputtering for their potential in promoting osseointegration and as an ion delivery system for biomaterials. The processing behaviour of PBG under ion bombardment has been investigated, notably the phenomena of preferential sputtering. The relative sputtering yields for the elements within quaternary and quinternary glass oxides have been found to be dependent upon the chemical bonding and momentum exchange interactions at the surface, subsurface layers of the target material. This led to preferential sputtering in the order, P < Fe < Ca < Mg < Na, based on the absolute changes from 6 target compositions to their respective coating compositions, showing a reduction in P2O5 and Fe2O3 of between 10.3-15.2, 0.2-0.6 mol% respectively and an increase in MgO, CaO, and Na2O of 4.8-6.0, 0.1-3.8, and 3.0-6.9 mol% respectively. The order primarily corresponded to the relative dissociation energies of the network modifying ions bound to oxygen of (818.0 or 1227.0 for Fe), 928.0 for Ca, 788.0 for Mg, and 257.0 kJ mol(-1) for Na. The deposition rates from targets T1-T6 varied between 1.59-1.93 nm min(-1) at a constant pressure of 1.05 Pa. Increasing the pressure from 0.28 to 1.87 Pa led to improved stoichiometric transfer from target to coating. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据