4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Reactively sputtered films in the CuxS-ZnS-SnSy system: From metastability to equilibrium

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 582, 期 -, 页码 208-214

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.10.076

关键词

Copper zinc tin sulfide; Thin film solar cells; Reactive sputtering; Secondary phases; Raman scattering; X-ray diffraction; Kesterite

资金

  1. People Program (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's seventh Framework Program FP7 under REA Grant [316488 (KESTCELLS)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu2ZnSnS4 is a promising photovoltaic absorber containing earth abundant elements. Using a two stage process, low temperature reactive co-sputtering followed by heat treatment, we have previously achieved a 7.9% efficient solar cell. Because the sputtered precursors contain non-equilibrium phases with unusual crystal structures, it is crucial to understand their nature and their conversion into Cu2ZnSnS4 (and secondary phases) during heat treatment. In this study, we report phase analysis of reactively sputtered binary and ternary sulfides in the CuxS-ZnS-SnSy system before and after annealing. In the as deposited films, Raman spectroscopy with 532 and 325 nm excitation wavelengths reveals expected phases for the binaries (CuS, ZnS and SnS2) and the ternary (Cu2SnS3), and unique metastable phases for the Cu-Zn-S and Zn-Sn-S precursors. Upon annealing, the non-equilibrium phases disappear, accompanied by additional chemical changes. Excess S content in the films is removed, and in the Sn-S and Zn-Sn-S films, further S loss from decomposition of SnSx (x > 1) and CuS respectively generates SnS and CuxS (x > 1). Due to the presence of SnS vapor, Cu2ZnSnS4 is generated from the Cu-Zn-S precursor. Additionally, the range of sulfur partial pressure in the annealing process is estimated according to the temperature-pressure phase diagram. This gives us useful insight allowing better control of annealing conditions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据