4.5 Article

Optimization of the CIGS based thin film solar cells: Numerical simulation and analysis

期刊

OPTIK
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 67-70

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.06.034

关键词

Thin film solar cells; Chalcopyrite; Capacitance-voltage; Thickness optimization; SCAPS

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chalcopyrite Cu(ln,Ga)Se (CIGS) is a very promising material for thin film photovoltaics and offers a number of interesting advantages compared to the bulk silicon devices. CIGS absorbers today have a typical thickness of about 1-2 mu m. However, on the way toward mass production, it will be necessary to reduce the thickness even further. This paper indicates a numerical study to optimization of CIGS based thin film solar cells. An optimum value of the thickness of this structure has been calculated and it is shown that by optimizing the thickness of the cell efficiency has been increases and cost of production can be reduces. Numerical optimizations have been done by adjusting parameters such as the combination of band gap and mismatch as well as the specific structure of the cell. It is shown that by optimization of the considered structure, open circuit voltage increases and an improvement of conversion efficiency has been observed in comparison to the conventional CIGS system. Capacitance-voltage characteristics and depletion region width versus applied voltage for optimized cell and typical cell has been calculated which simulation results predict that by reducing cell layers in the optimized cell structure, there is no drastically changes in depletion layer profile versus applied voltage. From the simulation results it was found that by optimization of the considered structure, optimized value of CIGS and transparent conductive oxide thickness are 0.3 mu m and 20 nm and also an improvement of conversion efficiency has been observed in comparison to the conventional CIGS which cell efficiency increases from 17.65 % to 20.34%, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据