4.6 Article

Design and performance of a terahertz absorber based on patterned graphene

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 43, 期 17, 页码 4296-4299

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OL.43.004296

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61661012]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2017GXNSFBA198121]
  3. Dean Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Wireless Wideband Communication and Signal Processing [GXKL06160108, GXKL06170104]
  4. Dean Project of Laboratory of Cognitive Radio and Information Processing (Ministry of Education)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern terahertz (THz) technology offers the advantage of enhanced target detection ability with high spatial and temporal resolutions in the THz band, which makes it a formidable threat to stealth targets. Consequently, THz absorbers have outstanding potential as an electromagnetic countermeasure. In this Letter, we design, fabricate, and characterize a THz absorber based on patterned graphene. We present the transfer, photolithography, and etching processes involved in graphene patterning, as well as the experimental measurements of the fabricated absorber. Our simulations show that with an increase in the Fermi energy, the performance of the designed absorber gradually improves and, finally, decreases slightly. Further, the absorption bandwidth first broadens and then narrows slightly. The effective bandwidth with absorption >= 90% ranges from 1.54 to 2.23 THz, with the relative bandwidth (RBW) reaching about 36.6%. Although the measured RBW (from similar to 12% to similar to 14% and then to similar to 8%) slightly deviates from the simulated one, the position of the resonant frequency is well matched between theory and experiment. Moreover, we illuminate the absorption mechanism using the theory of destructive interference. This Letter can significantly contribute to the design, manufacture, and application of patterned graphene-based THz absorbers. (C) 2018 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据