4.6 Article

Noise models for low counting rate coherent diffraction imaging

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 20, 期 23, 页码 25914-25934

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.025914

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. French ANR [ANR-11-BS10-0005]
  2. EPSRC [EP/E034055/1]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-11-BS10-0005] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  4. EPSRC [EP/E034055/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E034055/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coherent diffraction imaging (CDI) is a lens-less microscopy method that extracts the complex-valued exit field from intensity measurements alone. It is of particular importance for microscopy imaging with diffraction set-ups where high quality lenses are not available. The inversion scheme allowing the phase retrieval is based on the use of an iterative algorithm. In this work, we address the question of the choice of the iterative process in the case of data corrupted by photon or electron shot noise. Several noise models are presented and further used within two inversion strategies, the ordered subset and the scaled gradient. Based on analytical and numerical analysis together with Monte-Carlo studies, we show that any physical interpretations drawn from a CDI iterative technique require a detailed understanding of the relationship between the noise model and the used inversion method. We observe that iterative algorithms often assume implicitly a noise model. For low counting rates, each noise model behaves differently. Moreover, the used optimization strategy introduces its own artefacts. Based on this analysis, we develop a hybrid strategy which works efficiently in the absence of an informed initial guess. Our work emphasises issues which should be considered carefully when inverting experimental data. (C) 2012 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据